Eradicating hunger. Food insecurity
 US$ 500 BILLION PER YEAR, 
TO END HUNGER, EXTREME POVERTY 
AND PANDEMICS ALL OVER PLANET EARTH
17,000 children die every day of hunger and lack of proper vaccination, 6.3 million per year ... With the resources of the Solidarity Fund 2% of global GDP annually, may be allocated 500 billion of U $ S dollars to eradicate hunger and alleviate extreme poverty across the planet.

From Global Solidarity we are working to apply a radical change to the status quo of our civilization. Our goal is to concentrate funds for two trillion dollars, equivalent to 2% of the world's annual GDP.
We are doing it through honest work, concentrated strategic and competitive intelligence, intensively, globally and massively. We call on all goodwill companies to join this effort to save the children of the planet and stop global warming. This initiative is the only one focused on a specific strategy to achieve the necessary change in the short term.


The funds will be applied to finance four basic strategic goals:


1.- U$S 500 billion per year to end hunger, extreme poverty and pandemics on the entire planet Earth.


2.- U$S 1 trillion and a half per year to be applied in sustainable projects. Objectives 


3.- U$S 10 billion per year to ensure food sovereignty, stop depending on agrochemical corporations and transgenic producers. Develop and apply substitute marketing systems so that the products from the fruit and vegetable belts reach consumers in large cities directly, without intermediaries. The goal is to lower the price of food as soon as possible.


4.- Everyone to work. Through the combined systems of e-commerce and intensive, global and massive e-business, loyal e-mails and user pages with the option of their own domain of choice will be enabled to carry out global telesales and teleworking tasks. To this will be added the global e-learning service to ensure constant training for all users. Everyone should practice physical exercise, take care of the diet, work and study constantly. In this way the average IQ of the world population will be increased and the poor and lower middle class will be rescued from the darkness and helplessness of ignorance and unemployment.


We donate 80% of the proceeds from MegaShop and 50% of the net profit produced by all our other systems.

The public sector does not assume its full responsibility in time and form in the face of the accelerating Global Climate Emergency. We are heading towards collective suicide. To avoid this, Global Solidarity Live is leading the initiative to concentrate 2% of the world's annual GDP, from the private sector, and apply it to end hunger, extreme poverty and global warming.


If we want to survive and safeguard our physical assets and civilization, we have no other alternative. We must move to immediate action with courage, firmness, vision and determination. We only have 5 years left before everything starts to spiral out of control on the planet.


We trust that companies and multinationals understand the situation of alarming increasing risk that we find ourselves in before the event horizon of the accelerating climate anomaly and that they join and cooperate with this initiative.


The continuity of our species depends on the set of effective and timely solidarity actions.
We are the only and last chance to defend the life of everyone on planet Earth.


Don't leave us alone.


Assume your share of joint responsibility.

To fulfill our mission, we call for the addition of cooperative and solidarity actions to Microsoft and Google. It is not our will to compete. If we are not understood or supported, we will develop the resources and means. We are not going to allow millions of human beings to continue to die of hunger, millions of children from hunger and that all Humanity is at risk of disappearing due to an irresponsible administration of the planet. That is our commitment.

 

FOOD INSECURITY

800 million people in the world are hungry. It is a chilling fact. Especially considering that a total of 8 billion people live on our planet and our productive capacity would be capable of feeding twice as many, 12 billion. Says the FAO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Hunger is then a problem with a solution. But international rulers disagree. They hold in their hands the key to the eradication of hunger. But they don't use it. Do they have the real will to end the problem?
1 About 800 million people in the world do not have enough food to lead a healthy and active life. That's about one in nine people on earth.

The vast majority of hungry people in the world live in developing countries, where 13.5% of the population is undernourished.

Asia is the continent with the largest number of hungry people in the world - two thirds of the total. The percentage in South Asia has decreased in recent years, but in Western Asia it has increased slightly.

Sub-Saharan Africa is the region with the highest prevalence (percentage of the population) of hungry. One person in four is malnourished.

Poor nutrition is the cause of almost half (45%) of deaths in children under five - 3.1 million children each year.

One in six children - approximately 100 million - in developing countries are underweight.

One in four of the world's children are stunted. In developing countries the proportion may rise to one in three.

If women farmers had the same access to resources as men, the number of hungry people in the world could be reduced by up to 150 million.

66 million children of primary school age go to school hungry in developing countries. In Africa alone there are 23 million.

WFP estimates that about US$3.2 billion per year is needed to reach all 66 million hungry school-age children.

Hunger kills thousands of innocent people every day
Hunger is one of the most serious problems on our planet and one of the most unjust deaths.


Although the countries of the North are also suffering from it in what we call the 'fourth world' -currently and because of the crisis this population bag is growing remarkably-, where food shortages affect it the most is in the South, in the regions affected by economic neocolonialism and that are brutally plundered by the powers and transnational corporations.


While in the developed world we have, for the most part, an abundance of food and live full of luxuries and products that we very often do not need, in the South thousands of people die every day for not being able to buy even the most basic food. The situation is not new and this is precisely what is most worrying. May we be able to allow it and maintain it over time, knowing the human drama it entails for thousands of families.


Is it possible to solve this serious situation and facilitate the right to life for the poorest people on the planet? It is. And above all, the governments of the North hold the key. Currently in the world we live 7 billion people. And according to a recent study by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, our global productive capacity could feed 12 billion people. The following fragment of the documentary 'We feed the World' makes it very clear.


Therefore, it would only take good management - ethical and distanced from the desire for profits of current multinationals - of raw materials to be able to convert ours into a fairer world. There are alternatives, another model is possible. And not only possible, but urgent.


While it is true that the most powerful governments on the planet meet periodically to deal with the food problem and to seek solutions, it is also true that they do not really put all the resources available to achieve its eradication. Why? Well, because they want to maintain a system that does not alter the current order and that continues to benefit a few above the rest.


Very often, in the North, we citizens live turning our backs on this situation. We don't think or don't want to think because deep down we know we should do something. Perhaps, if we were more fully aware of the reality, the seriousness of the situation and the inhumane and unethical nature of many companies and speculators that favor the prolongation of hunger in the world, we would acquire a greater social conscience.


The objective of this observatory on the causes of hunger will be precisely this, to delve into the dark framework of international trade relations andtry to detect the causes that cause and maintain the food crisis in less industrialized countries.


A total of 800 million people (10.9% of the world population) suffer from hunger. In the last 25 years, the number of undernourished people has been reduced by 216 million. Haiti and Zambia are the countries in the worst situation

Despite the fact that the number is decreasing, in the world there are still a total of 795 million people who suffer from hunger. This is indicated by the latest data provided by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in its report "The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015", published recently. Ten years ago there were 167 million more people undernourished, and if we go back to the years 1990-92, the figure was 216 million higher than today, exceeding then one billion.


In relative figures, the percentage of undernourished people in the world currently stands at 10.9%, compared to 18.6% in the period 1990-92. Therefore, the percentage reduction has been almost 8 points.


The FAO report reveals that this decline has been more pronounced in developing regions, where it has gone from a percentage of 23.3% of the population suffering from hunger in 1990-92 to 12.9% today, and that despite the considerable population growth that has occurred in these areas of the planet.


By country, those in the worst situation are, in this order, Haiti (where 53.4% of the population suffers from hunger), Zambia (47.8%) and the Central African Republic (47.7%) ( see list below of the 30 countries with the highest percentage of undernourished population).


If we analyze the absolute figures, the ranking of hunger in the world is headed by India (194.6 million undernourished people), China (133.8 million), Pakistan (41.4 million) and Ethiopia (31.6 million ).


The economic crisis and political instability in some of these developing areas - such as Central Africa and Western Asia - have hampered the progress that was being made, according to FAO experts.


The fastest progress has been in Latin America, in East and South-East Asia, the Caucasus and Central Asia, and in North and West Africa. By contrast, hunger reductions have not been achieved at the desired rate in South Asia, Oceania, the Caribbean, and southern and eastern Africa.


The report indicates that "economic growth is a key success factor in reducing undernourishment, but it has to be inclusive and offer opportunities to improve the livelihoods of the poor." In this sense, "increasing the productivity and income of small family farmers are fundamental to achieving progress". Natural catastrophes and those caused by man or political instability have resulted in prolonged crises that have led to greater vulnerability and food insecurity for a large part of the population. In addition, "in these contexts, measures to protect vulnerable groups of the population and improve livelihoods have been difficult to apply or ineffective." 17,000 children die every day from hunger and lack of adequate vaccination, 6,3 million per year... With the resources of the Solidarity Fund of 2% of world GDP, annually, 500 billion US dollars may be allocated to eradicate the problem of hunger and alleviate extreme poverty throughout the planet.

 

800 million people worldwide go hungry. It is a chilling fact. Especially considering that on our planet live in total seven billion people and our production capacity would be able to feed twice, to 12 billion. Says FAO, the Food and Agriculture Organization. Hunger is then a problem with a solution. But international leaders do not agree. They hold the key to eradicating hunger in their hands. But they do not use it. Is there a real will to tackle the problem?

  1 Around 800 million people worldwide do not have enough food to lead a healthy and active life. That's about one in nine people on earth.  

The vast majority of hungry people in the world live in developing countries, where 13.5% of the population suffers from malnutrition.

Asia is the continent with the largest number of people worldwide who suffer from hunger - two thirds. The percentage in South Asia has fallen in recent years, but in West Asia increased slightly.

Sub-Saharan Africa is the region with the highest prevalence (percentage of population) hungry. One in four people suffer from undernutrition.

Poor nutrition is the cause of almost half (45%) of deaths in children under five - 3.1 million children each year. 

One in six children - roughly 100 million - in developing countries have underweight.

One in four of the world's children suffer from stunting. In developing countries the proportion may rise to one in three.

   If women farmers had the same access as men to resources, the number of hungry people in the world could be reduced to 150 million.

66 million primary school age children attend school hungry in developing countries. In Africa alone there are 23 million

WFP estimates it will need about US $ 3.2 billion per year to reach all 66 million hungry children in school.

Day hunger kills thousands of innocent people

Hunger is one of the most serious problems of our planet and most wrongful death occurs.

Although the Northern countries suffer what we call 'world'-quarter and now because of the crisis this bag - population is growing, which most affects the food shortages in the South, in the affected regions economic neocolonialism and are brutally sacked by the powers and transnational corporations.

While in the developed world have, mainly, plenty of food and live full of luxuries and products that do not need very often in the South thousands of people die every day because they can not afford even the most basic foodstuffs. The situation is not new and it is precisely this concern. May we be able to allow and keep in time, knowing the human drama of thousands of families.

Is it possible to resolve this serious situation and facilitate the right to life to the world's poorest people? It is. And especially Northern governments hold the key. Currently in the world we live 7 billion people. And according to a recent study by the Food and Agriculture Organization, our global production capacity could feed 12 billion people. What makes clear the following excerpt of the documentary 'We Feed the World'.

Therefore, it would take only a good management She understands ethics and away from the desire for profits of multinational actuales- raw materials to make ours a better world. There are alternatives, another model is possible. And not only possible but urgent.

While it is true that the most powerful governments in the world meet regularly to address the food problem and to find solutions, so they really do not put all available resources to reach its eradication. Why? Because they want to keep a system that does not alter the existing order and to continue benefiting the few above the rest.

 Very often, in the North live citizens turning away from this situation. We do not think or do not want to think because deep down we know we should do something. Perhaps, if we knew more about the reality, the severity of the situation and inhumane and unethical nature of many companies and speculators who favor the extension of hunger in the world, would acquire greater social awareness.

The objective of this observatory on the causes of hunger is precisely this, get into the dark fabric of international trade relations and try to identify the causes and keep the food crisis in less industrialized countries.

A total of 800 million people (10.9% of the global population) go hungry. In the past 25 years it has been reduced by 216 million the number of undernourished people. Haiti and Zambia are countries worse

Although the figure is reduced in the world is still a total of 795 million hungry people. This is indicated by recent data provided by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in its report "The State of Food Insecurity in the mundo2015" recently published.

Ten years ago there were 167 million undernourished people over, and if we go back to 1990-92, the figure was 216 million higher than the current, then surpassing the billion.

 In relative terms, the percentage of undernourished people in the world currently stands at 10.9% compared to 18.6% for the period 1990-92. Therefore, the percentage reduction was almost 8 points.

The FAO report reveals that this decline has been more pronounced in developing regions, where it has gone from a share of 23.3% of the population went hungry in 1990-92 to 12.9% today, and that despite considerable population growth that has occurred in these areas of the planet.

For countries which are in a worse situation are, in this order, Haiti (where 53.4% ​​of the population goes hungry), Zambia (47.8%) and Central African Republic (47.7%) ( see below list of 30 countries with the highest percentage of undernourished population).

If we look at the absolute figures, the ranking of world hunger is headed by India (194.6 million of undernourished people), China (133.8 million), Pakistan (41.4 million) and Ethiopia (31.6 million ).

The economic crisis and political instability in some of these developing areas such as for example in Central Africa and West Asia have hampered progress being achieved, according to FAO experts.

The fastest progress have occurred in Latin America in the eastern and southeastern regions of Asia, the Caucasus and Central Asia, and in the northern and western regions of Africa. Instead, it has not achieved the desired reducing hunger in South Asia, Oceania, the Caribbean and Eastern and Southern African rhythm.

 The report indicates that "economic growth is a key factor of success in reducing undernourishment, but has to be inclusive and provide opportunities to improve the livelihoods of the poor". In this sense, "increasing productivity and incomes of small family farmers are key to achieving progress."

FAO also warns in its conclusions that "in many countries that have failed to meet international targets on hunger, natural disasters and manmade or political instability, have resulted in protracted crises that have led to increased vulnerability and food insecurity of much of the population. " In addition, "in these contexts, measures to protect vulnerable groups of the population and improve livelihoods have been cumbersome or ineffective".

 

 

 

PROBLEM AND SOLUTION

PROBLEM: Avoid the temperature increase plus two degrees Celsius is not enough, concluded Dr. James Hansen, climate change expert and former NASA scientist. As explained in their study published in the journal European Geoscience Union, two degrees over global warming could be catastrophic for humanity, because in just 50 years, the sea level will rise 3-8 meters.

The situation had already lived before. The evidence indicates that an increase in temperature of just 1 degree Celsius, came to raise sea level between 4 and 9 meters, which in turn led to extreme storms will form over a thousand years ago.

Through the publication, Hansen and the 16 co-authors, have made an appeal to politicians, as in 2009, world leaders pledged under the Copenhagen Accord, not to let the temperature to rise more than two degrees . Which, apparently, is not enough.

In recent research, Hansen and co-author Makiko Sato, also from GISS compared the climate of today, the Holocene, with a similar period of interglacial periods - periods when the polar ice caps exist but the world was dominated by glaciers.

Studying corals drilled ice sheets and deep ocean sediments, Hansen found that global mean temperatures during the Eemian, which began 130,000 years ago and lasted about 15,000 years, were less degree warmer than today.

If temperatures to rise 2 ° C over pre-industrial times, the average global temperature could far exceed that of the Eemian, when sea level was four to six meters higher than today, Hansen said.

The IPCC projects an increase of 2 ° C and rising ocean levels 1 meter end of the century, but the recent report by former NASA scientist, Dr. James Hansen says that with only 1 ° C over the waters will rise up 8 meters, at the latest within 50 years. He justifies this with what happened in the Eemian, 100,000 years ago.

 "To overcome this new picture of the situation, which puts us in" planetary emergency "they lack capital intensive, such as mobilized during World War II. The message is that, free, will not solve environmental problems. In that sense from GSI propose the Green Solidarity Fund 2% of global GDP, annually, to meet this demand, or the option of Planetary Army saving $ 1 trillion per year, among all countries that adhere to the new coalition. It has been created extraordinary a situation that requires extraordinary resources. The cost is two billion dollars a year. Either this, or chaos within two decades. Consider that only the United States has 1,700 coastal locations. The main cities of the world are coastal and including hundreds of millions of people live. When flooded where will they go? What eat? What drink? Where did they sleep? This is a question of survival and pure logic. Do you have or do not have reason Dr. Hansen ? ".

SOLUTION: Global Solidarity Fund proposes the Solidarity Green 2% of global GDP annually. With these funds, equivalent to $ 2 trillion, they will plant 20 billion trees per year to capture CO2, invest in fusion reactors and clean energy systems, changing vehicles combustion engines by electric and hydrogen addition 25% to end hunger, pandemics and extreme poverty, creating conditions for a world with less inequality will go.

INVITATION: Your community may join Coastal Cities Against Climate Change, with the island nations that make up the areas to be mostly impacted by global warming and participate in block to petition the United Nations for the immediate implementation of the Green Solidarity Fund , only rational solution to return to 350 ppm of free CO2 in our atmosphere and return the entire ecosystem to its former point of balance and sustainability. If you choose not to participate they are choosing to leave their properties in a few years ahead, when the oceans rise inevitably, because we do not take the right decisions on time.

 





 

 

 

2% for the planet and Eco Planetary Goverment

   CONTACT


© 2023 GSL  All Rights Reserved -  777.globalsolidarity.live@gmail.com